Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010117642019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5198/2019
Between:
1. DARAVATHU SUJATHA, D/O SAKRU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO.1-5-1031, MARUTHI NAGAR, DILSUKHNAGAR, SARCIORANGAR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, AMARAVATHI
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLITE, SRI POTTI SRIRARNULU NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE/ SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, SRI POTTI SRIRARNULU NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. KOVUR, SRI PATTI SRIRARNULU NELLORE DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ,
Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent police in not follovving the mandatory provisions. for conducting investigation into the FI.R.No.28 of 2019 dt.18-02-2019 as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of Articles 14,19and 21 of the Constitution of India and to grant
2 IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police to conduct investigation into the F.I.R.No.28 of 2019 dt.18-02-2019, pending disposal of the above main writ petition and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SAI KRISHNA MOHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5198 of 2019
ORDER:
There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even on earlier occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing the respondents, on written instructions, submits that the police have completed the investigation and filed the final report before the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge – cum – Special Court for Trial of SC/ST (POA) Cases, Nellore.
3. In view of the same, the cause in the Writ Petition no longer survives for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the proper forum for necessary redress in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
4
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 4th December, 2025 cbn
5 77 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.5198 of 2019
4th December, 2025
cbn