IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18006 OF 2005 Between: Smt. C. Visalakshmi, Kurnool, W/o. V Gurumurthy Sastry Retd. Special Assistant, Syndicate Bank, R/o. C/o. K.V.S. Gopalakrishna Sastry, D.No. 87/265/1, Plot No. 49 Kamalanagar, Kurnool 518 002 ...PETITIONER AND Syndicate Bank, a body constituted under the Banking Companies’ (Acquisition and Transfer Of Undertakings) Act 1970, Having its Head Office at MANIPAL-576 119, Rep. by its General Manager (P) ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the .Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed ^herewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction imore particularly in the nature of writ of Mandmaus a) declaring that the petitioner is entitled to payment of pension calculated on the basis of actual pay, Fixed Personal Allowance, Professional Qualification Allowance and other allowances and emoluments during their last ten (10) months of service in the Bank as mandated in the Syndicate Bank (Employees’) Pension Regulations 1995 together ; deat^ness allowance thereon and direct the respondent-Bank differential amount of pension and commutation value of pension to each of the petitioners on that basis together with interest at 18% p.a, from the date each of the petitioners retired from the service of the Bank until the date of payment, drawn with to pay b) and consequently declare the of Order Ref. No. 508/0012/SWD/P en 5399/01/03 dt. 25-2-2003 of the Respondent Bank as illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary, violative of the very Scheme of pension and hence liable to be set-aside and pass such other order costs orders including awarding of or Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI D V BHADRAM Counsel for the Respondent: SRI G V S KISHORE KUMAR The Court made the following Order: APHC010018842005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) LfJiiVTiN [3332] THURSDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18006/2005 Between: Smt. C. Visalakshmi, Kurnool, ...PETITIONER AND Syndicate Bank Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT 1.D VBHADRAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1.. 2.G VS KISHORE KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER: On 08.04.2025 and 17.04.2025, there is no representation for the petitioner and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner not interested in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 2. IS 3. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri D V Bhadram, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri G V S Kishore Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies Vna (gsg) w HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.18006 of 2005 ^2 3 OCT 2025 ★^'^JjirrentSectioiiXi^'' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS