MAINEJAR PRASAD TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
NA529/1171/2025 · 2025-05-08
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51963 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51963 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:75518 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1171 of 2025 Applicant :- Mainejar Prasad Tiwari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Complaint Case No. 1679 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 452 IPC, Police Station Koirauna, District Bhadohi pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate-II, Bhadohi at Gyanpur expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicants are complainant in the said case. The summoning order in the matter was passed on 30.7.2024 and the accused were summoned to face trial under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 452 IPC. It is also submitted that the accused persons appeared but the complaint case is still pending at the stage of recording of evidence under section 244 Cr.P.C. and only dates are being fixed. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 5. It appears from the perusal of the record that above complaint case is pending at the stage of recording of evidence under Section 244 CrPC. Hence, the trial court is directed to make all possible efforts to record the evidence within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and thereafter make all possible endeavours to dispose of the case under reference as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, keeping in view the work load in the said Court, if there is no other legal impediment. 6. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides
the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 7. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 9.5.2025 safi Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad