PATAN MANSOOR ALI KHAN v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/10761/2022 · 2025-11-04
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51960 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51960 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010181092022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10761/2022 Between:
1. PATAN MANSOOR ALI KHAN, S/O. KHASIM KHAN, AGED34 YEARS, OCC. TAX PRACTITIONER, RIO. D.NO.42-477-5-2, BHAGYANAGAR COLONY, BESIDE SAI KRISHNA SCHOOL, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMUDISTRICT AT ANANTHAPURAMU.
3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU CIRCLE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MAHILA POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
6. S A VASEEM, D/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC .
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT, R/O. D.NO.11-278, RAJAHAMSA GOLDEN HOMES,
KLD ROAD, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the
2
respondents particularly the 5threspondent at the instance of the 6th respondent in repeatedly insisting the petitioner to appear before his authority and deliver the possession of Honda Jazz Model Car bearing Registration No. A.P. 04BL0017 to the custody of 6th respondent in spite of monthly loan installment of Rs. 14,500/-are being paid by the petitioner from his Savings Bank Account No. 31030854139 with State Bank of India, Bhagyanagar Colony, Kadapa Branch since 54 months, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority or sanction of law, and violative of Articles 14 and21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly the 5th respondent not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner's personal life and liberty nor insist him to deliver possession of said car to the custody of 6th respondent.”
2. Heard Ms.N.Revathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be
disposed of by making the interim order absolute.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police have nothing to do with the matter and they are not interfering in the disputes between the parties.
5. As seen from the interim order dated 19.04.2022 in W.P.No.10761 of 2022, the respondents are directed not to put any pressure on the petitioner to handover the Honda Jazz Model car bearing Registration No.AP04BL0017 without any order being passed by a competent Court.
6. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date: 05.11.2025 ASR
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.10761 of 2022
Dt..05.11.2025
ASR