Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5196 (JHR)

TANIF HUSSAIN @ MD TANIF HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1383/2025 · 2025-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2025:JHHC:19608] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1383 of 2025 Tanif Hussain @ Md. Tanif Husan … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan , Adv. For the State : Mr. S.K.Tiwari, Spl. PP. 04 / 17.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.77 of 2024 registered under Section 111 (2) (ii), 317 (2), 317 (4), 318 (4), 319 (2), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 (B) (C) (D) of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has defrauded the victim namely Mallappa to the tune of Rs. 15,207/-, Govind Kumar to the tune of Rs. 13,200/-, Om Prakash to the tune of Rs. 11,300/- and Ranga Swamy to the tune of Rs. 99,890/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 22 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 20.12.2024 , as mentioned in para 22 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes to transfer Rs. 15,207/- to the bank account of Mallappa , Rs. 13,200/- to the bank account of Govind Kumar, Rs. 11,300/- to the bank account of Om Prakash and Rs. 99,890 /- to the bank account of Ranga Swamy without prejudice to his defence in this case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail showing the proof that the petitioner has transferred Rs. 15,207/- to the bank account of Mallappa , Rs. 13,200/- to the bank account of Govind Kumar, Rs. 11,300/- to the bank account of Om Prakash and Rs. 99,890 /- to the bank account of Ranga Swamy without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.77 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-