Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51958 (CHH)

GONCHU NAG v. GHASIRAM POYAM

MAC/852/2023 · 2025-10-07

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.1 of 2 IN MAC-852-2023 2025:CGHC:50068 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 852 of 2023 [Arising out of award dt. 10.03.2023, passed in Claim Case No.115 of 2021 (Gonchu Nag and another v. Ghasiram Poyam and others) by the 3rd Addl. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bastar at Jagdalpur (CG)] 1- Gonchu Nag, S/o Somaru Nag, aged about 38 years 2- Mahangi Nag W/o Gonchu Nag aged about 30 years Both R/o Dhakadpara, Village Kurenga, Tehsil Tokapal, P.S. Parpa, District Bastar Chhattisgarh ... Appellants Versus 1 - Ghasiram Poyam S/o Hidmaram Poyam Aged About 23 Years R/o Tahkapal, Through Dhansuram Mandavi S/o Handaram Mandavi, R/o Hidmapara, Village Karanji, P.S.Parpa, Tehsil Tokapal, District Bastar Chhattisgarh (Driver) 2 - Dhansuram Mandavi S/o Handaram Mandavi Aged About 23 Years R/o Hidmapara, Village Karanji, P.S. Parpa, Tehsil Tokapal, District Bastar Chhattisgarh (Owner) 3 - Shriram General Insurance Company Limited Through Branch Manager, Branch Office Plant No. 1, 4th Floor, Maruti Heights, Beside R.K. Mall, G.E.Road Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Insurance Company) ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Appellant : Mr. PK Tulsyan, Advocate For Respondents No.1-2 : None though served. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN Page No.2 of 2 IN MAC-852-2023 08.10.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the appellant/claimant and respondent/Insurance Company have amicably settled the dispute out of the Court on an agreement that in addition to the amount of compensation awarded by the learned Claims Tribunal to the appellant/Claimant, the respondent/Insurance Company herein will pay Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) to the appellant/Claimant herein within a period of 60 from the date of this order without any interest. 2. The aforesaid submission is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the respondent- Insurance Company is directed to deposit the said agreed amount i.e. Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) without interest to the appellant/Claimant within a period of 60 days from today. However, rest of the conditions of the impugned award shall remain intact. Hence, this appeal stands finally disposed of in view of aforesaid settlement arrived at between the parties. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if