HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 241 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the appellants to press the appeal, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the appeal has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the appellants feel that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 10, 2025 NLY Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rajeev Kumar Saini Counsel for Respondent(s) : Chetan Chatterjee (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) C/M Inter College And Another .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad