Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5195 (UTT)

SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/637/2025 · 2025-04-16

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2762 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 637 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Vikas Singh, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Karan Singh Dugtal, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Himashu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Sunil Kumar’ is praying for regular bail in relation to First Information Report dated 18.06.2024 bearing FIR No. 0101 of 2024 P.S. Pithoragarh, District Pithoragarh, wherein, the present applicant has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that after investigation the chargesheet has been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation. 5. Apart from this, he submits that the applicant was in love with the victim and the physical relations was consensual. 6. Apart from this, he submits that only on the basis of false pretext of marriage the FIR has been lodged. 7. On the other side, learned A.G.A. submits that the victim supports the case of the prosecution in her statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. 8. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this court is of the view that the applicant does not deserve for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 16.04.2025 PR 2025:UHC:2762