BABULAL MEENA SON OF LATE SHRI RAMESHWAR LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/610/2025 · 2025-01-31
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5195 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5195 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4392] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. (Petition) No. 610/2025 Babulal Meena Son of Late Shri Rameshwar Lal Meena, Aged About 42 Years, Resident of In Front of Khatikon Ke Mandir, Golyawas, Bada Padampura, Chaksu, Shivdaspura, Jaipur City (South), Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through PP
2. Yuvraj Singh Son of Shri Girraj Singh, Resident of 69/334, V.T. Road, Mansarovar, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 31/01/2025
1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash and set aside the criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.210/2017 titled
“State of Rajasthan Vs. Babulal” pending before the Court of learned Additional Senior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.15, Jaipur Metropolitan-I (Chaksu) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC arising out of FIR No.210/2017 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (South) on 20.05.2017.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has also filed one more compromise deed executed today itself.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the complainant/respondent, on instructions, from the complainant who is present in Court admits the fact of compromise arrived between the parties and submits that he has no objection if the criminal proceedings pending against the petitioner are quashed by this Court.
[2025:RJ-JP:4392] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-610/2025]
4. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the averments made in the FIR and so also the written compromise entered into between the parties.
5. As per the averments made in the FIR, nothing is there as regards the third party.
6. Considering the fact of compromise between the parties and terms and conditions therein, this Court feels that it would be a futile exercise to continue the criminal proceedings against the accused-petitioner and may be a wastage of time of the trial Court.
7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the compromise arrived between the parties which is admitted by counsel for the complainant, this Court deems just and proper to exercise the inherent jurisdiction of this Court vested under Section 528 of BNSS to quash the criminal proceedings pending against the accused-petitioner.
8. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.210/2017 titled “State of Rajasthan Vs. Babulal” pending against the petitioner before the Court of learned Additional Senior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.15, Jaipur Metropolitan-I (Chaksu) are hereby quashed.
9. Pending application/s, if any, also stand disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /45