IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 207 Renu Sharma A. Sreenivas, IAS, Vitran Nigam CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 12.5.2022 Court in CWP Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others”, vide which direction was issued to respondent No.1 speaking order on the legal notice dated 21.4.2020 (Annexure P filed by the petitioner, within a receipt of the copy of this order”. Compliance Report dated 29.7.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Jeet Ram, Executive Engineer, Sub Urban Division, DHBVN, Sirsa. The COCP-2171-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2171 of 2025 Date of decision : Renu Sharma Versus A. Sreenivas, IAS, Managing Director, Dskshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Ajay Kamboj, Advocate with Ms. Kiranpreet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Vasundhra Asija Bhandari, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 12.5.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co Court in CWP-19073-2021 titled as “Subhash Chander Sharma vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others”, vide which direction was issued to respondent No.1 speaking order on the legal notice dated 21.4.2020 (Annexure P filed by the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order”. Learned counsel for the respondent has filed the Compliance Report dated 29.7.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Jeet Ram, Executive Engineer, Sub Urban Division, DHBVN, Sirsa. The 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2171 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-31.07.2025 …..Petitioner Managing Director, Dskshin Haryana Bijli …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ajay Kamboj, Advocate with Ms. Kiranpreet Kaur, Advocate Mrs. Vasundhra Asija Bhandari, Advocate Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this s “Subhash Chander Sharma vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others”, vide which direction was issued to respondent No.1 “….to pass an appropriate speaking order on the legal notice dated 21.4.2020 (Annexure P-5) period of eight weeks from the date of Learned counsel for the respondent has filed the Compliance Report dated 29.7.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Jeet Ram, Executive Engineer, Sub Urban Division, DHBVN, Sirsa. The VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.01 18.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document same is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. that direction of this Court vide order dated 12.5.2022 (Annexure P passed by co as “Subhash Chander Sharma vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others” has been complied with and payment has been released to the petitioner by way of Cheque No.075255 dated 25.7.2025 (Annexure R Rs.5,42,590/ present petition. petitioner, however, it is submitted that there is still some amount outstanding against the re respondent from the salary of alleged recoveries were never a part subject matter o contempt petition passed in the present petition, the same is July 31, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2171-2025 (O & M) same is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the respondent that direction of this Court vide order dated 12.5.2022 (Annexure P passed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP as “Subhash Chander Sharma vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others” has been complied with and payment has been released to the petitioner by way of Cheque No.075255 dated 25.7.2025 (Annexure R-1) drawn at HDFC Bank 2,590/- in favour of petitioner; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. The above fact is not denied by learned counsel for the petitioner, however, it is submitted that there is still some amount outstanding against the respondent against the recoveries made by the respondent from the salary of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent clarifies that the said alleged recoveries were never a part subject matter o contempt petition/Writ Petition. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 same is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel It is pointed out by learned counsel for the respondent that direction of this Court vide order dated 12.5.2022 (Annexure P-1) Court in CWP-19073-2021 titled as “Subhash Chander Sharma vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others” has been complied with and payment has been released to the petitioner by way of Cheque No.075255 dated 1) drawn at HDFC Bank, amounting to in favour of petitioner; thus, no cause survives in the The above fact is not denied by learned counsel for the petitioner, however, it is submitted that there is still some amount spondent against the recoveries made by the the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent clarifies that the said alleged recoveries were never a part subject matter of the alleged ove, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.01 18.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document