Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51945 (MAD)

Lifestyle International Private Limited v. Bipin John

A/2044/2025 · 2025-07-24

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY A.No.2044 of 2025 in C.S.(Comm.Div)No.2 of 2024 Lifestyle International Private Limited, Express Avenue, 49, 50L, Block No.9, Triplicane Village, Whites Road, Mylapore, Chennai – 600014, Represented by its Authorized Signatory Mr. A. Shyam Ravindhar ... Applicant/Plaintiff -vs- Bipin John, Trading as Melange Designing Studio Dwarai Swami Lane, MG Road, Ernakulam, Kerala 682035. ... Respondent/Defendant Prayer: Application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules Read With Order VIII Rule 9 of the CPC, 1908, to permit the applicant to file replication to the written statement filed by the respondent. For Applicant : Mr.Arun C.Mohan For Respondent : Mr. M.S.Bharath 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J kj ORDER By this application, the plaintiff seeks leave to file a reply to the written statement. In the affidavit in support thereof, it is stated that it is necessary to file the reply statement to deal with several untenable allegations in the written statement. 2. Learned counsel for the defendant has no serious objection to this application being allowed. 3. Upon being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown, this application is allowed. 24.07.2025 kj A.No.2044 of 2025 in C.S.(Comm.Div)No.2 of 2024 (1/2) 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis