1 / 3 2025:CGHC:49802 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5220 of 2025 1 - Keshav Kumar Kashyap S/o Shri Jagannath Kashyap Aged About 50 Years 2 - Udho Kashyap S/o Shri Jagannath Kashyap Aged About 57 Years 3 - Madho Kashyap S/o Shri Jagannath Kashyap Aged About 55 Years All the petitioner R/o- Near Ajit Hotel Telipara Bilaspur, Tahsil & District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 495001 ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) Pin – 492001 2 - Tahsildar Bilaspur Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) Pin -495001 3 - Collector Bilaspur Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) Pin -495001 4 - Sub Divisional Magistrate Bilaspur Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) Pin -495001 5 - Revenue Inspector Juna Bilaspur Office Add. - Collectorate Campus Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) Pin 495001(C.G.) Pin 495001 ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Curtis Collins, Advocate For State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 07/10/2025 1. The instant petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- 10.1 This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to produce entire record pertaining to ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.10.10 11:16:10 +0530 2 / 3 the petitioner’s case. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to carry out a lawful process of Demarcation with regard to Khara no. 332/2, 332/4, 332/6 and 332/9 Rakba 0.021, 0.022, 0.022, 0.021 Hector and necessary steps may be taken in accordance to law. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct respondent no.5 to comply with the notice dated 04.04.2024 (Annexure- P/1) of the Tahsildar’s order. 10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the respondent to decide the representation (Annexure P/3) dated 22/9/23 & 1/9/23 filed by the petitioners. 10.5 Any other relief in the discretion of this Hon’ble Court. 10.6 Cost of the petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that the petitioners have made representation on 22/09/2025, however, the said representation has not been decided, therefore, the direction may be issued to decide the same. 3. Learned State counsel submits that they have no objection in deciding the representation of the petitioners. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 5. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation dated 22/09/2025 after giving proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned persons expeditiously as soon as possible in accordance with law. 3 / 3 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the representation of the petitioner on its own merits. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu