CR-8139-202 209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Sanjeev Kumar Kushal Saini (now deceased) through his LRs. CORAM: Present:- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) dated 10.09.2025 passed by learned Appellate Authority, Panchkula, whereby the order dated Controller, ordered to be evicted from the demised premises. 2. states that he does not press the petition on merit but the petitioner may be given reasonable time to make arrangement of alternative accommodation 3. Mr.Yashvardhan Goyal the respondent eleven months premises i.e. upto 31.12.2026. 2025 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-8139 Date of Decision: Sanjeev Kumar Versus Kushal Saini (now deceased) through his LRs. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akshay Jindal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yashvardhan Goyal, Advocate for the respondents. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Present petition is directed against the eviction order 10.09.2025 passed by learned Appellate Authority, Panchkula, whereby the order dated 29.05.2018 Controller, Panchkula, stands reversed and the petitioner/ tenant was ed to be evicted from the demised premises. After arguing for sometime counsel for the petitioner that he does not press the petition on merit but the petitioner given reasonable time to make arrangement of alternative accommodation for his business. At this stage, Mr. Akshay Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Yashvardhan Goyal, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondents/landlords and agrees to eleven months to the petitioner/ tenant for i.e. upto 31.12.2026. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 8139-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.01.2026 ........ Petitioner Kushal Saini (now deceased) through his LRs. ......... Respondents JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akshay Jindal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yashvardhan Goyal, Advocate Present petition is directed against the eviction order 10.09.2025 passed by learned Appellate Authority, Panchkula, 29.05.2018 passed by Learned Rent , stands reversed and the petitioner/ tenant was ed to be evicted from the demised premises. After arguing for sometime counsel for the petitioner that he does not press the petition on merit but the petitioner given reasonable time to make arrangement of alternative Akshay Jindal, Senior Advocate with , Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of to the arrangement of granting to the petitioner/ tenant for vacating the tenanted Present petition is directed against the eviction order 10.09.2025 passed by learned Appellate Authority, Panchkula, Rent , stands reversed and the petitioner/ tenant was After arguing for sometime counsel for the petitioner that he does not press the petition on merit but the petitioner given reasonable time to make arrangement of alternative Akshay Jindal, Senior Advocate with , Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of the arrangement of granting vacating the tenanted SANJAY GUPTA 2026.01.21 19:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-8139-2025 (O&M) [2] 4. In view of the above, eviction order dated 10.09.2025 passed by the Appellate Authority, Panchkula is confirmed, subject, however, to following conditions:- i) the petitioner shall hand over vacant possession of the tenancy premises to the respondents/landlords on or before 31.12.2026; ii) the petitioner shall furnish an undertaking before the Rent Controller, Panchkula within fifteen days from today that he will hand over vacant possession of the tenancy premises to the respondents on or before 31.12.2026; and iii) the petitioner shall clear arrears of rent as directed by Rent Controller, Panchkula vide its order dated 29.05.2018 within two months from today; iv) the petitioner shall also clear the arrears of mesne profits from the date of order of eviction dated 29.05.2018 passed by Rent Controller, Panchkula uptill date, within the time period of two months from today; v) The petitioner-tenant shall not cause any damage to the property, create any encumbrance, or transfer possession, in any manner, of the demised premises. vi) The petitioner-tenant shall continue to use and occupy the property and enjoy the same strictly in terms of the municipal by-laws. No further construction, more so unauthorized in nature, shall be carried out by him. vii) Before handing over the possession of the demised premises, the petitioner-tenant shall clear all statutory dues. viii) In the event the petitioner violating any of these terms, it shall be open to the landlord(s) to initiate the proceedings for obtaining possession in terms of the order of ejectment and also initiate proceedings for contempt, if so advised. ix) All pending litigation(s), if any, inter se the parties in relation to the demised premises shall stand closed.” SANJAY GUPTA 2026.01.21 19:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-8139-2025 (O&M) [3] 5. Failure of the petitioner to comply with either of the conditions would entitle the respondents/landlords to execute the eviction order forthwith. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 20.01.2026 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) sanjay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SANJAY GUPTA 2026.01.21 19:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document