RAJNI JAMWAL v. HIRDESH KUMAR SECY.EDU.DEPTT.AND ORS
CPSW/409/2013 · 2025-02-18
Sindhu Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5194 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5194 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 40
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 409/2013
Rajni Jamwal
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None
V/s
Hirdesh Kumar Secy. Edu. Deptt and Ors. …..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER 18.02.2025
Petitioner seeks the implementation of the judgment/order passed by this Court on 20.10.2013 passed by this Court in SWP No. 2456/2013 vide which the respondents were directed that the petitioners be not dislodged by another contractual arrangement during the said period. However, the respondents are at liberty to fill up the said posts on permanent basis. Respondent have filed their statement of facts and have submitted that in compliance to the order passed by this Court, the claim of the petitioners has been considered. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed.
(SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE
Jammu: 18.02.2025 Javid Iqbal