Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51937 (CHH)

HEERABAI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1669/2025 · 2025-04-01

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15528 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1669 of 2025 1 - Heerabai W/o Late Maniram Kenwat Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Chilhati, Post Loharsi (Son) P.S. And Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Land Acquisition Officer/ Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Masturi District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Chief Executive Officer Public Words Department, Division No. 01, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - A.D.B. Project Chhattisgarh Street Development Project Public Words Department Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Chandrasen Chouhan, Advocate For State : Shri Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.05.06 11:28:54 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 02/04/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is registered owner of the land bearing Khasra No.1160 area 0.24 acres situated at Village Chilhati, Patwari Halka No.50, Tahsil Pachpedi, District Bilaspur out of which land measuring area 0.02 acres has been acquired, however, no compensation has been paid, as such this petition has been filed for issuance of necessary direction in respect of payment of compensation to the petitioner. 2. In the first round, when the matter was called for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the State was directed to seek instructions upon which now the learned State Counsel submits that the proceeding is pending and it is likely that the compensation will be paid within 60 days. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that if the respondents are willing to grant compensation to the petitioner, he will not pursue this petition and will file an appropriate representation for payment of the compensation in respect of the admission made by learned State Counsel. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and further considering the admission made by learned State Counsel, it is expected that appropriate orders will be passed within 60 days for payment of compensation to the petitioner. 3 The Land Acquisition Officer is directed to pass appropriate orders in respect of payment of compensation to the petitioner within 60 days from the date of production of a copy of this order. A copy of the order in this respect shall be sent to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court forthwith along with a covering letter stating compliance of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh