Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 51935 (BOM)
SATISHKUMAR SUKHDEO DAHAT v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPT. OF EDUCATION AND SPORTS, MUMBAI AND OTHERS
WP/717/2023 · 2025-01-09
Shri Nitin W Sambre, Vrushali V Joshi
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51935 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51935 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 958.wp.717.23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 717/2023 Satishkumar Sukhdeo Dahat Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. P. N. Shende, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. I. J. Damle, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 4/State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 09/01/2025. . The petition is not pressed as the petitioner is presently working on the establishment of respondent No.4 and is being paid regular salary post his declaration as a surplus non-teaching staff from the post of Head Clerk.
2. In the aforesaid background, we dispose of the petition with liberty to approach afresh in case, if any cause to that effect arises.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule 2025:BHC-NAG:226-DB