APHC010042492020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 2544/2020 Between: 1. SMT.KOMMINENI DURGAMMA, W/O.LATE VEERAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE HOLD R/O.REDDIGUDEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRI SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, REDDYGUDEM, REDDYGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. KONDAPALLI KONDALA RAO, S/O. RAMA KOTAIAH, AGED 47 YEARS R/O. REDDYGUDEM, REDDYGUDEM MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. KONDAPALLI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. KONDALA RAO, AGED 30 YEARS R/O.REDDYGUDEM, REDDYGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not granting the Police Aid in favour of the petitioner against the respondent No.4 and 5 in respect of the land RS No.404/11 to an extent of Ac.0.11 cents situated at Reddygudem Village and Mandal, Krishna District is illegal, even pending of FIR No.41 of 2017 and FIR No.158 of 2019 against Respondents 4 and 5, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondent Police to provide Police Aid with petitioner own costs in favour of the petitioner herein against the respondent No.4 and 5 in respect of the land in question 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KONDAPALLI SYAM SUNDER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. In that view, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No.2544 of 2020 12.09.2025 Mjl /*