Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51929 (CHH)

DALJIT SINGH SANDHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRCA/1850/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:57288 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1850 of 2025 Daljit Singh Sandhu S/o Mahendra Singh Aged About 26 Years R/o Village- Pamboi, In Front Of Bada Gurudwara Chowki Panch Grihiya P.S. Rangan Nangal, Tehsil - Batala, Distt.- Gurudaspur, Punjab. ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. - Urla, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant : Shri Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Bharat Gulabani, PL. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order On Board 25/11/2025 1. The applicant has preferred this application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), for grant of anticipatory bail, apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.44/2025 registered at Police Station Urla, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) for alleged commission of offence punishable under GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2025.11.26 16:55:16 +0530 2 Sections 109,191(2),191(3), 190, 117(2), 61(2) of the BNS and section 25,27 of the Arms Act. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 09.03.2025, the complainant namely Jaspal Singh lodged a report that when he was sitting at the counter of New Punjab Dhaba, situated at Bypass Road, Urla, Raipur (C.G.) and Gurjeet Singh went to sleep in a room of the Dhaba and employees Vinod, Sauni, Jagdish were present there, then at about 2.20 am, maternal uncle of Gurjeet Singh namely Jagir alias Sabba came from the front side of the Dhaba with a sword & a stick in his hand alongwith other persons and then after all of them together started assaulting him with the sword & stick, with the intention to kill. He ran out of the Dhaba to save himself, screaming loudly, on hearing the voice, Gurjeet Singh came outside & Jagir Singh reached there, regarding some old dispute with the intention of killing Gurjeet Singh, he & his companions started hitting him with swords & sticks. Jagir Singh's companion also hit Vinod, who was standing near the kitchen, on the head with a stick. Then all of them, out of fear, ran out of the Dhaba to save their lives. Due to the assault, the complainant got grievous injuries on his head, Gurjeet Singh got injuries on his shoulder &; arm and Vinod got serious injuries on his head. They were admitted to AIIMS hospital for treatment. On the report of the complainant, a case without numbered crime under sections 109, 3(5) Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 was registered and crime number 44/25, section 109, 3(5) Bhartiya 3 Nyay Sanhita, 2023 was registered after reaching to the police station and investigation was taken up. During the investigation, accused Jagir Singh & Lakhwinder Singh were taken into custody and their memorandum statement was recorded upon interrogation. A sword used in the incident was recovered from accused Jagir Singh and an iron dagger like weapon & a baseball bat were recovered from Lakhwinder Singh and seized in front of witnesses and the accused were arrested and on the basis of memorandum of the co-accused the present applicant has been indulged in the present crime. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not named in the FIR nor in the statement of the complainant and the co-accused Lakhwinder Singh @ Pentu has been granted regular bail by this Court in MCRC No.6345/2025 on 11/08/2025, therefore he prays to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail and he would submit that the applicant has been named in the statement of one of the injured Jaspal Singh and the injured Vinod has suffered serious injuries on his parietal region and fracture was also found. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record. 4 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties, materials available on record, considering the fact that the applicant too participated in the incident and the injured has suffered injuries and also considering the fact that investigation is still going on, therefore I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant - Daljit Singh Sandhu, involved in Crime No.44/2025 registered at Police Station Urla, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 109,191(2),191(3), 190, 117(2), 61(2) of the BNS and section 25,27 of the Arms Act is rejected. Sd/-Sd S Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice gouri