APHC010538542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 27841 OF 2025 Between: Annapurna Bar And Restaurant, Represented by its Proprietor, Gopavaram Sainatha Reddy, aged 60 years, S/o. Gopavaram Obulareddy, H.No.25-191, Sanjeeva Nagar, Nandyal, Nandyal District-518501. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Nandyal Municipality, Represented by its Commissioner, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 3. The District Collector, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 5. The Station House Officer, Nandyal II Town Police Station, Nandyal District. 6. C Basheed, aged 35 years, S/o. Mabasha, H.No.26/6-ll-A4, Royal Compund, Nandyal. 7. Akhun Shashavali, aged 36 years, S/o. Gouse Basha Near Hamza Masjid, Saleem Nagar, Nandyal. Haneef Nagar, H.NO.25-410-A2 8. S Sandani Basha, aged 45 Chandbada, Nandyal. years, S/o. S. Khadar Basha, H.No.4-140-A, ...Respondents Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ. Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 interfering with the Petitioners lawful business activities in running Annapurna Bar and Restaurant on the rented premises in'*Sy.No.693, to an extent of Ac0.28cents (80 links) situated at Saleem Nagar, Nandyal due process as illegal, arbitrary. Article 12, 19(1) (g), 300-A of the Constitution Principles of Natural Justice and Consequently direct the interfere with the Petitioners lawful business Bar and Restaurant without following capricious, unconstitutional, violation of of India and violation of Respondents not to activities in running Annapurna on the rented premises in Sy.No.693, to an extent of Ac0.28cents (80 links) situated at Saleem Nagar, Nandyal. lA NO: 1 OF 907^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioner’s lawful business activities in running “Annapurna Bar & Restaurant Sy.No.693, to an extent of Ac0.28cents Nandyal pending disposal of the Writ Petition. on the rented premises in (80 links) situated at Saleem Nagar, lA NO: 2 OF 2n9*i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 4“’ & 5* Respondent, to provide protection to the Petitioner’s lawful business activities in running “Annapurna Bar & Restaurant to ’ on the rented premises in Sy.No.693, to an extent of Ac0.28cents Saleem Nagar, Nandyal pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THATHIREDDY ASHOK Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMN URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI G. LAKSHMI NARAYANA SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents 4 & 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents 6 to 8: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: (80 links) situated at SRIVASTAVA & APHC010538542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 27841/2025 Between: 1.ANNAPURNA BAR AND RESTAURANT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, GOPAVARAM SAINATHA REDDY, AGED 60 YEARS, S/0. GOPAVARAM OBULAREDDY, NAGAR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT-518501. H.NO.25-191, SANJEEVA ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE NANDYAL MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, DISTRICT. 5.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDYAL II TOWN POLICE STATION, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 6.C BASHEED, AGED 35 YEARS, S/0. MABASHA, H.N0.26/6-LL-A4, HANEEF NAGAR, ROYAL COMPUND, NANDYAL. AND NANDYAL 2 7.AKHUN SHASHAVALI, AGED 36 YEARS, H.NO.25-410-A2, NEAR HAMZA MASJID NANDYAL. S/0. GOUSE BASHA, SALEEM NAGAR, 8.S SANDANI BASHA, AGED 45 YEARS, H.NO.4-140-A, CHANDBADA, NANDYAL. S/0. S. KHADAR BASHA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tppleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 interfering with the Petitioners lawful business activities in running Annapurna Bar and Restaurant on the rented premises in Sy.No.693, to an extent of Ac0.28cents (80 links) situated at Saleem Nagar, Nandyal, without following due process as illegal, arbitrary, capricious, unconstitutional, violation of Article 12, 19(1) (g), 300-A of the Constitution of India and violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioners lawful business activities in running Annapurna Bar and Restaurant on the rented premises in Sy.No.693, to an extent of Ac0.28cents (80 links) situated at Saleem Nagar, Nandyal and Pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioner’s lawful business activities in running “Annapurna Bar & Restaurant” on the rented premises in Sy.No.693, to an extent of Ac0.28cents (80 links) situated at Saleem Nagar, Nandyal pending disposal of the Writ Petition and Pass lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances $tated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th & 5th Respondent, to provide protection to the Petitioner’s lawful business activities Restaurant” on the rented premises in Sy.No.693, to an extent of Ac0.28cents (80 links) situated at Saleem Nagar, Nandyal pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass. in running “Annapurna Bar & 3 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 4 ORDER:- The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondent authorities in interfering with the petitioner’s activity of running a Bar in rented premises in Survey No.693. r It is submitted that the unofficial respondents have instigated respondent Nos.2 to 5 and are causing hindrance to the business of the petitioner. This Court, on 10.10.2025, directed the counsel for the petitioner to verify if any permission was obtained for the subject construction has been obtained from the 2"'* respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner is erecting temporary sheds, no permission was sought from the 2"^^ respondent. It is further submitted that the petitioner shall apply for grant of permission to the 2"^^ respondent and the 2"^^ respondent can consider the application of the petitioner. 3. The petitioner shall submit an application to the 2"'^ respondent and the 2"*^ respondent shall duly consider the application for grant of permission for erecting the temporary sheds. The writ petition can be disposed off at the admission stage, directing the 2"^^ respondent to consider the application of the petitioner in accordance with law. The 2^^^^ respondent shall consider the application for giving permission within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Court. 4. I 5 > 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed off. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI DEPUTY REGISTRAR f 1 \ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To 1. The Principal Secretary Department of Municipal Administration and Urban Development, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner, Nandyal Municipality, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 3. The District Collector, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 5. The Station House Officer, Nandyal II Town Police Station, Nandyal District. 6. One CC to Sri Thathireddy Ashok Srivastava, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to Sri G. Lakshmi Narayana, SC for Municipalities [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 9. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration & Urban Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 10. [OUT] 11. Two CD Copies RAM HIGH COURT DATED: 14/10/2025 ORDER WP.NO. 27841 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS