KAMBAIAHGARI SUBRAMANYAM v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/27686/2025 · 2025-10-07
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51922 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51922 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010536462025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 27686/2025 Between:
1. KAMBAIAHGARI SUBRAMANYAM, S/O LATE K.RAMAMOORTHY,
AGED. 37 YEARS, R/O. BHUVANAGIRIPALLI VILLAGE,
RAJAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT,A.P -516126.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, RAYACHOTY.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, . RAJAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
5. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, RAJAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
6. NAGOTHU SURESH, S/O SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/O D.B.N PALLI VILLAGE.
RAJAMPET MANDAL.ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
7. GOLI MOHAN RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O MAHABOOB NAGAR.RAJAMPET MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, direction, or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent authorities in trying to interfere and dispossess the petitioner from his land in an extent of Ac. 0.03 cents situated in Survey Nos. 175 and 176/1 of Utukuru Village, Rajampet Mandal, Annamayya District, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law as highly arbitrary. illegal, null and void, against norms of public policy and principles of natural justice and
2 violative of fundamental rights apart from Article 300A of the Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the respondent authorities herein not to dispossess the petitioner from the above said subject land, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities herein not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners land in an extent of Ac.0.03 cents situated in Sy.Nos.175 and 176/1 of Utukur village, Rajampet Mandal, Annamayya District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ZAMPANI BHANU RAJA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.27686 of 2025
ORDER:-
Sri V.Chethan Kumar Reddy, learned counsel, representing
learned counsel for petitioner, sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 08.10.2025 KBN