123 CR-8805-2025 Date of Decision: February 09, 2026 The Haryana Coopera"ve Supply & Marke"ng Federa"on Ltd. and another …Pe""oners Versus Parveen Kumar …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, Advocate for the peoners. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) Peoners herein are the defendants before learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Panipat in a Civil Suit No.CS-190-2022, tled as “Parveen Kumar v. The Haryana Cooperave Supply & Markeng Federaon Ltd. and another”. They are aggrieved by the order dated 23.01.2025 (Annexure P-1), whereby their evidence was closed. The peoners-defendants have also assailed the order dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure P-2), whereby their applicaon to produce addional evidence was dismissed. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the peoners that a.er framing of the issues, the evidence of the plainff was closed on 02.12.2024. The affidavit of DW-1 on behalf of the peoners as examinon-in-chief was filed on 09.01.2025 and it is at the request of counsel for the plainff that the ma5er was adjourned to 17.01.2025 for cross-examinaon of DW1. The witnesses of the defendants could not come present on 17.01.2025 and the ma5er was adjourned to 23.01.2025 and on that very date, the trial Court closed the evidence of the defendants. 3. Learned counsel for the peoners submits that the valuable rights of the peoners are involved, as the plainff-respondent is seeking declaraon regarding a memo whereby an amount of more than
1.12 crore was sought to be recovered by the peoners-defendants from plainffs. SARITA RANI 2026.02.09 19:00 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order CR-8805-2025 - 2 - 4. Having gone through the paper book and hearing learned counsel for the peoners, present revision peon is hereby allowed. The impugned order dated 23.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) appears to have been passed by the trial Court in haste, without providing sufficient and adequate opportunies to the peoners to produce their evidence. The trial Court is hereby directed to provide two effecve opportunies to the peoners- defendants to conclude their evidence. However, this shall be subject to
25,000/- as cost payable to the respondent-plainff by way of a demand dra.. On their doing so, the trial Court shall fix a date for producing the evidence of the peoners-defendants. 5. Since this order has been passed without issuing noce to the respondent, lest it may delay the disposal of the ma5er, therefore, respondent will be at liberty to approach this Court, in case he feels aggrieved. February 09, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.02.09 19:00 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order