1 / 2 110.wp3295.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3295 OF 2025 Ravidayal Ishardayal Patle Vs. State of Maharashtra, State Excise Department, Mantralaya, Mumbaid and Ors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.G. Jagtap, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. T.H. Khan, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 4. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 30.06.2025. Looking to the order passed by the respondent No.2- Commissioner. As the innocuous order, which we intend to pass. Issuance of notice to the respondent No.5, therefore, the same is dispensed with. 2. We direct Ms. Khan, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4. 3. Our attention is invited to the pending Appeal Nos.117/2023 and 91/2023 on the file of respondent No.2 – Commissioner, State Excise, Prity 2 / 2 110.wp3295.2025 Mumbai. We make it clear that the ad-interim order passed by the respondent No.2 – Commissioner will remain in operation, till decision in appeal. 4. In that view of the matter, we direct the petitioner to appear before the appellate authority on 21.07.2025. 5. The respondent No.2 – Commissioner, shall make every endeavour to decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of four months, needless to state that the same shall in accordance with provisions of law and hearing all the stakeholders. 6. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (Sachin S. Deshmukh, J.) (Nitin W. Sambre, J.) Prity