Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:51073
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11810 of 2025 1 - Mrs. Manisha Netam W/o Vishvanath Neatam Aged About 39 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) At Govt. Primary School Selegaon, Block Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Joint Director Education Division Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Collector Kanker, Distt. Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 5 - District Education Officer Kanker, Distt. Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Block Education Officer Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Block Education Officer Koilebeda, Distt. Kanker, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shashikant Chauhan, Advocate. For State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board 14/10
/2025
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing order dated 05.06.2025 passed by respondent No. 5 by which the petitioner has been held surplus at Government Primary School Selegaon, Block- Bhanupratappur and posted at Government Primary School, Komrapara, Block- Koyalibeda. The petitioner has also challenged the rationalization policy dated 02.08.2024.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the representation preferred by the petitioner has been rejected by the respondent authorities though he has not served with the copy of the ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.10.15 10:37:45 +0530
2 rejection order, but the same has been sent to him through whats app message. He would further submit that the instant petition may kindly be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the order of rejection before the appellate authority.
3. Prayer is allowed.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of granting aforesaid liberty in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun