2025:JHHC:26024 1 Cont.Case (Civil) No. 364 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 364 of 2025 Ratnakar Mallick, aged about 59 years, S/o Late Nidhi Mallick, Chief Manager, (Personnel) presently posted at VIP Cell, BCCL Head Quarter, Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O.+P.S.- Koyla Nagar, District- Dhanbad, Resident of Flat No. B, 4th Floor, Subhadra Complex, Sahyogi Nagar, Section-III, P.O.- K.G. Ashram, P.S.- Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad. ….........Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1. Samiran Dutta, S/o not known to the petitioner, the Chairman-cum- Managing Director, Bharat Coking Coal Limited having its registered office at Level- III, Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O. + P.s.- Koyla Nagar, District- Dhanbad 2. Murli Krishna Ramaian, s/o not known to the petitioner, the Director Personnel, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, having its registered office at Level- I, Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O. + P.S. Koyla Nagar, District Dhanbad. 3. Aman Raja, S/o not known to the petitioner, the Chief Vigilance Officer. Bharat Coking Coal Limited, having registered office at Level-V, Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O. + P.S. Koyla Nagar, District Dhanbad. 4. Satendra Kumar, S/o not known to the petitioner, the General Manager (Vigilance), Bharat Coking Coal Limited, having its registered office at Level-V, Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O. + P.S. Koyla Nagar, District Dhanbad. 5. Surapuraddy B. Ravindranath, S/o not known to the petitioner, the General Manager (Personnel) / Executive Establishment, Coal India Limited, Coal Bhawan, Premises No.4, MAR, Plot No. 4F-III Action Area 1A, New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata, P.O. + P.S- Rajarhat, West Bengal. 6.The State of Jharkhand .......... Opposite Parties ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Bihari Lal, Advocate For the O.P.-State : Mr. P.C. Sinha, A.C to G.A.-III For the O.P- BCCL : Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate 05/29.08.2025 The present contempt petition has been filed against the willful disobedience of the order dated 07.02.2024 passed in W.P.(S) No. 130 of 2024. 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the writ petition adverse order has been passed in the pending departmental proceeding and petitioner has already challenged the same by filing departmental appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite parties are present and do not 2025:JHHC:26024 2 Cont.Case (Civil) No. 364 of 2025 dispute the same. 4. In that view of the matter, the present contempt petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in accordance with law. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty