Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:HHC:1848-DB )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 587 of 2025
Decided on: 8th January, 2025
Punjab National Bank
.......petitioner
versus
State of H.P and another
...Respondents
Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the petitioner: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.G with Mr. Raj Negi, Dy. A.G.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Issue notice. Mr. Raj Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
The limited prayer made in this petition is to the effect that respondent No.2 be directed to decide the application filed by the petitioner under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (for short ‘SARFAESI Act’).
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
( 2025:HHC:1848-DB ) 2
3.
The learned Advocate General has placed on record copy of order dated 07.01.2025 which goes to indicate that the application filed by the petitioner has since been decided.
4.
In this view of the matter, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as such, so also the pending applications, if any.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan )
Judge
January 08, 2025 ( Rakesh Kainthla ) (naveen)
Judge