DYANOBA SO MADHAV POTBHARE v. MARUTI SO SHANKAR RATHOD AND OTHER
CA/451/2024 · 2025-03-03
Shri Rohit W Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5190 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5190 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
10 ca 451 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 451 OF 2024 IN SAST/409/2024 Dyanoba S/o Madhav Potbhare VERSUS Maruti S/o Shankar Rathod And Others … Shri. R. B. Deshmukh, Advocate for Applicant Shri S. C. Swami, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 … CORUM :
ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE :
3rd MARCH, 2025 PER COURT :
1. The learned counsel for the applicant states that in an identical matter being Civil Application No. 452 of 2024, delay of 1317 days caused in filing the second appeal is condoned by this court vide order dated 10.12.2024.
2. He further states that the reason for condonation of delay is also the same, however, the respondents are different.
3. The learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute that delay in Civil Application No. 452 of 2024 is condoned by this court and the controversy in both the matters is the same.
4. In that view of the matter, the application for condonation of delay is allowed.
[ROHIT W. JOSHI] JUDGE KS_Kamble/ 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:6485