Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51899 (BOM)

PRATIK DADARAO GAWAI AND OTHERS. v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

APL/869/2025 · 2025-07-21

Shri Anil L Pansare, Shri M M Nerlikar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

47.apl.869.25 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [APL] No.869 of 2025 Pratik Dadarao Gawai and others vs. The State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., P.S. Khadan, Dist. Akola and another =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. N.S. Warulkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Amit Chutke, A.P.P. for Non-Applicant No.1. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE & M.M. NERLIKAR, JJ . DATE : 21 st JULY, 2025. The learned A.P.P. submits that charge-sheet has been filed. 02. That being so, the proceedings would render infructuous. Nonetheless, the applicants are at liberty to file proceedings for quashment of charge-sheet. 03. The application is disposed of in above terms. (M.M. Nerlikar, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) *sandesh 2025:BHC-NAG:7024-DB