Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:74463-DB Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13485 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chandrakesh Yadav Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kumar Ashutosh Srivastava,Nagendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C. Hon'ble Arindam Sinha,J. Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J.
1. Mr.Kumar Ashutosh Srivastava, learned advocate, appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client had applied for re-issue of passport on application dated 19th March, 2025. Copy of the online application receipt is at page no.6 (annexure no.SA-1) to the supplementary affidavit dated 2nd May, 2025. In spite thereof, the passport has not been reissued. He seeks direction for expeditious re-issue of the passport. 2. He relies on order dated 19th January, 2024 of co-ordinate Bench in a batch of writ petitions, leading case being Writ-C no. 41540 of 2023 (Pawan Kumar Rajbhar Vs. Union of India and two others), paragraph nos. 21 and 27. 3. Mr.Ambrish Shukla, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State and points out, the application for re-issue was made on statement of lost-passport. 4. Co-ordinate Bench in paragraph 21 of Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (supra) recorded fair statement made by learned Additional Solicitor General of India (A.S.G.I.) that there is no reason to withhold issuance, renewal or reissue of a passport. Furthermore, in paragraph 27 of the co-ordinate Bench discussed pendency of criminal case or cases or FIR registered, in which applicant, inter alia, for reissuance of passport has been mentioned as accused. There again fair statement made by learned A.S.G.I. was recorded, regarding cases where any NCR may be registered, the necessary passport may be issued, reissued, renewed, as the case may be, without any delay. No permission may be sought or required from the competent Court of criminal jurisdiction, in those cases. 5. The view as was taken by co-ordinate Bench covers petitioner's claim in the writ petition. Concerned respondent as may be respondent no.2 or any other is directed to forthwith deal with the application of petitioner, for reissue of passport in terms of Pawan
Kumar Rajbhar (supra). In event the application is to be rejected, petitioner must be informed of the reasons within four weeks of communication of certified copy of this order. It goes without saying, otherwise the passport must be reissued within aforesaid period. 6. The writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.5.2025 LN Tripathi (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- LALIT TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad