1 2025:CGHC:49918 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9487 of 2023 1 - Naresh Kumar Thakur S/o Dauvva Ram Aged About 39 Years Constable No. 653, Posted At Police Station- Balod, District- Balod C.G., R/o Sector-2, Qtr. No. 40/g, Road No. 16, Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs (Police), New Raipur, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Civil And Revenue, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Inspector General Of Police Durg Range, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintendent Of Police Balod, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 5 - Superintendent Of Police Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Pandey, G. A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07.10.2025 ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 1. The present writ petition has been filed primarily seeking a relief of the respondents to immediately act upon the select list in which the petitioner has been held to be entitled for promotion to the post of Head Constable, at par with the personnel who were already promoted from the very same select list. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that he had cleared the departmental promotion examination for promotion to the post of Head Constable from the post of Constable that was conducted in the 2015 and the respondents have been periodically filling up those posts by frequently issuing promotion orders subject to availability of vacancies. In the process, the Government had on earlier occasion issued promotion orders. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in the present case is squarely covered with the order passed in WPS No. 5405 of 2021 parties being Smt. Disha Singh Rajput & Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others dated 29.09.2021. and as such the present petition may be disposed of in terms of aforesaid writ petition. 4. Learned Counsel for the State, also endorses the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of in the light of order passed in WPS No. 5405 of 2021 dated 29.09.2021 and the terms stated in the aforesaid petition in order to redress grievance of the petitioner for his promotion. 3 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s). Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena