APHC010041852017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18941/2017 Between: 1. K IMMANUEL, S/O LATE GNANAPRAKAH AGE: 63, 0CC: RETIRED HEAD MASTER, R/O RAMIREDDYPALEM, NARASARAOPET (T& M), GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY HIGHER EDUCATION DEPT HYD 2 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP. 2. PROJECT DIRECTOR, SSA, R.S. 102/2 VIJAYAKRISHNATOWERS, WESTLBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP. 3. PROJECT OFFICER, SSA, GUNTUR 0/O DEO OFFICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto pass an order or direction, more particularly in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus" to declare the action of the 3rd Respondent issuing the impugned proceedings vide R.C.No. 670/A2/SSA/ 2012 on 23.04.2016 is illegal, Contrary to law and un constitutional and consequently set a side the proceedings in R.C.No. 670/A2/SSA/ 2012 by the 3rd Respondent and reinstate the Petitioner in the earlier Post of AGCDO, Narasaraopet, Guntur District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 23087 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 suspend the impugned of the Petitioner Vide R.C.No. R.C.No. 670/A2/SSA/ 2012 by the 3rd Respondent on 23.04.2016 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K JOSEPH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G SEENA KUMAR (SC FOR APEWIDC AND RVM SSA 2. G SEENA KUMAR 3. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The court made the followingORDER:- When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K. Joseph, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the writ petition has become infructuous and no further orders are necessary. 2. Recording the above said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 01.09.2025 SCH 3 182 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.18941 of 2017 Date: 01.09.2025 SCH