1 APHC010595922025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30818/2025 Between: 1. CHANDALA SRINU, S/O CHANDALA SURYA RAO AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O 2-258,KONGODU VILLAGE KARAPA MANDAL, KAKINADA DIST. 2. VASAMSETTI KUMARA SWAMY,, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS D/O 2- 258, KONGODU VILLAGE,KARAPA MANDAL KAKINADA DT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, AMARAVATI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER/ SUB INSPECTOR, OF POLICE, KARAPA POLICE STATION, KARAPA VILLAGE, (KARAPA MANDAL), KAKINADA DISTRICT. 5. CHANDALA VENKATA DURGA SURYARAO, S/O CHANDALASRINU AGED ABOUT MAJOR D/O 2-258,KONGODU VILLAGE, KARAPA MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 2 6. CHANDALA DIVYA SRI, D/O CHANDALA SRINU AGED ABOUT MAJOR D/O 2-258,KONGODU VILLAGE, KARAPA MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the high handed action on the part of the respondents herein more particularly 4th respondent Station House Officer/ Sub-Inspector of Police, interfering the Civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th and 6th respondents threatening to vacate the 2nd petitioner who is the tenant of the residential house D.No 2-258 in Sy no.95/2 in Kongodu Village,Karapa Mandal is contrary to the law apart from violative of principles of natural justice and violative of article 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially to direct the respondents including the 4th respondent Station House Officer/ Sub-Inspector of Police Karapa police Station, Kakinada District not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th and 6th respondents including threatening to vacate the 2nd petitioner who is the tenant of the residential house D.No 2-258 in Sy no.95/2 in Kongodu Villageand to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents including the 4th respondent Station House Officer/ Sub- Inspector of Police Karapa police Station, Kakinada District not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th and 6th respondents including threatening to vacate the 2nd petitioner who is the tenant of the residential house D.No: 2-258 in Sy no.95/2 in Kongodu Village pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BOKKA SATYANARAYANA KAMLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30818 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the high handed action on the part of the respondents herein more particularly 4th respondent Station House Officer/ Sub-Inspector of Police, interfering the Civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th and 6th respondents threatening to vacate the 2nd petitioner who is the tenant of the residential house D.No 2-258 in Sy.no.95/2 in Kongodu Village,Karapa Mandal is contrary to the law apart from violative of principles of natural justice and violative of article 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially to direct the respondents including the 4th respondent Station House Officer/ Sub-Inspector of Police Karapa police Station, Kakinada District not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th and 6th respondents including threatening to vacate the 2nd petitioner who is the tenant of the residential house D.No 2-258 in Sy no.95/2 in Kongodu Villageand to pass.…” 2. Heard Sri Bokka Satyanarayana Kamla, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the official respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that on 19.10.2025, the respondent police have received a representation from the 6th respondent, who is the daughter of the 1st petitioner, against the 2nd petitioner. Basing on the said complaint, on 22.10.2025, both the parties were called to the police station and after 4 conducting the preliminary enquiry, both the parties stated that they will withdraw the complaint and given a withdrawal letter jointly. He would further submit that except for the purpose of preliminary enquiry, the police never interfered with the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.11.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30818 of 2025 Dated.07.11.2025 UPS 212