Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51875 (AP)

A SRINIVSA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/15562/2023 · 2025-11-27

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010300662023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.15562 of 2023 Between: 1. A SRINIVSA RAO, S/O KOTESWARA RAO, AGE 47 YEARS, R/ O. NALLAPADU VILLAGE, GUNTUR AND DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT, NARASARAOPET 3. THE DISTRICT SURVEYOR, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, PALNADU DISTRICT NARASARAOPET 4. THE TAHSILDAR MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, SATTENAPALLI, PALNADU DISTRICT 5. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, SATTENAPALLI, PALNADU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 4th and 5th Respondents in fixing the boundaries by surveying the land to an extent of land admeasuring Ac. 3-70 cents comprised in Sy. No. 140/1 situated at Sattenapalli, Palnadu District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to conduct survey of land in Sy. No.140/1 of Sattenapalli, Palnadu District. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: "….to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 4th and 5th Respondents in fixing the boundaries by surveying the land to an extent of land admeasuring Ac.3-70 cents comprised in Sy.No.140/1 situated at Sattenapalli, Palnadu District as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to conduct survey of land in Sy.No.140/1 of Sattenapalli, Palnadu District and pass such other orders…." 2. The petitioner made an application in SPANDANA vide application No.FSNV012300182528 dated 29.05.2023 to conduct a survey. The said application was rejected by the respondent – authorities vide order dated 12.07.2023, stating that as there is no sub- division to Sy.No.140/1 of Sattenapalli village, Palnadu District. Hence, they are unable to conduct survey. 3. Therefore, the present Writ Petition is closed. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 12.07.2023, he is at liberty, to file appeal under Section 12 of the A.P.Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923, assailing the proceedings dated 12.07.2023 before the appellate authority or invoke any appropriate authority in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 28.11.2025 Siva/JAK 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.15562 of 2023 Date: 28.11.2025 Siva/JAK