1 2025:CGHC:51025-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP(227) No. 1024 of 2025 1 - Mohanlal Bajaj S/o Late Dewandas Bajaj, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Shop No. 09 Shivay Complex Gudhakhu Line, P.S.- Kotwali, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, ... Petitioner versus 1 - Shiv Kumar Chourasiya, S/o Shri Prem Kishore Chourasiya, Aged About 73 Years, R/o Gudhakhu Line Ward No. 25, P.S.- City Kotwali Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, 2 - Ramesh Kumar Chourasiya S/o Shri Prem Kishore Chourasiya Aged About 62 Years R/o Gudhakhu Line Ward No. 25, P.S.- City Kotwali Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : None Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, JJ. Order on Board (14.10.2025) Sanjay K. Agrawal,J 1. Heard on admission. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition questioning the order dated 09.07.2025 by which his application for amendment in the written statement has been dismissed by the Chhattisgarh Rent Control PRAKASH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRAKASH KUMAR Date: 2025.10.14 17:29:53 +0530 2 Tribunal, Raipur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’) in Appeal No.58A/2024 during the pendency of the appeal finding no merits. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the amendment proposed was relevant for just and proper decision of the appeal, therefore, the application for amendment filed before the learned Tribunal ought to have been allowed by the learned Tribunal. 4. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and went through the records with utmost circumspection. 5. The learned Tribunal while dismissing the application for amendment on 09.07.2025 has clearly recorded the finding that under Section 12 (2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 read with serial No.11(h) of Schedule 2 of the Act only, six months notice to the tenant is required, without any obligation to assign any reason but on the condition that the accommodation will not be leased out at a higher rent for atleast 12 months thereafter. In that view of the matter, the learned Tribunal is absolutely justified in dismissing the application for amendment. We do not find any merit in the present petition, as such, the same deserves to be dismissed. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge Prakash