SMT.BENDUKURI PARVATHI @ SASHIPRIYA v. SRI BENDUKURI VIJAYAKUMAR
FCA/51/2009 · 2025-12-30
Battu Devanand, Tuhin Kumar Gedela
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51868 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51868 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010041322009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3564] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 51/2009 Between:
1. SMT.BENDUKURI PARVATHI @ SASHIPRIYA, W/O.VIJAYA KUMAR, CHRISTIAN WORKING AS NURSE, GAYATHIRI NURSING HOME OPP. TO AMERICAN HOSPITAN, ZILLA PARISHAD JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM. R/O.D.NO.40-59/97, SANJEEVAYYA COLONY,
...APPELLANT AND
1. SRI BENDUKURI VIJAYAKUMAR, S/o.late Nagabhushanan, Christian Painter R/o.F-Block, Laxminagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 434 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 10 days in filing the apepal against the order and decree dated 29.08.2008 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam in OP No.162/2005 IA NO: 2 OF 2008(FCAMP 440 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order and decree in OP.No. 162/2005 passed by Family court, Visakhapatnam dated 29.08.2008 pending disposal of the appeal
2
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. V V N NARASIMHAM The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.51 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) On 16.02.2022, it was represented that the learned counsel for the appellant passed away. Hence, notice was ordered to the appellant. Notice sent to the appellant was served on the appellant on
18.03.2022. On 03.12.2025, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter is posted to 17.12.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 24.12.2025 also, there is no representation for the appellant. To give one more opportunity to the appellant, the appeal is posted to today. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. 2. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute this Appeal. 3. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 4
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
______________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 31.12.2025 TM
5
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.51 of 2009
Dated: 31.12.2025 TM