SBT TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/5303/2025 · 2025-10-09
Shri Arvind Kumar Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51864 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51864 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:50546
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5303 of 2025 1 - Sbt Textiles Private Limited A Duly Registered Company Under The Indian Companies Act, 1956 And Having Its Registered Office At 589, Urla Industrial Area, Raipur, C.G. 492001, Through Its Authorized Representative, Mr. Vikram Jain, S/o Bhagwati Lal Jain, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 20, South Avenue, Choubey Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Police Station- Saraswati Nagar- 492001, District -Raipur, C.G.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Commerce And Industries, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Directorate Of Industries Through Director, Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 1, Telibandha, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Investment Promotion Board Through Joint Director, Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 1, Telibandha, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ayush Singh Solanki, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. A.G.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge
Order on Board 10/10/2025
1. With the consent of the parties, heard finally.
2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following reliefs:
“10.1. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the Respondent no. 1 and 2 to decide
2 the petitioner’s representation dated 06.08.2025 (Annexure P/1 and P/2) in relation to review and amendment of the Bespoke Policy introduced vide Notification bearing No. F 20-14/2022/11/(6), Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar dated 28th February, 2022 by passing a reasoned and speaking
order. 10.2 The Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the respondent authorities to provide the petitioner with a fair opportunity of hearing while
deciding
the
petitioner’s representation dated 06.08.2025 and to allow the petitioner to submit relevant certificates and forms as required by the respondent authorities to effectively prove its case for review of the said Bespoke Policy notified by the respondent no. 1; 10.3 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass any other or further order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper and other reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require in favour of the petitioner.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the
3 representation made by the petitioner dated 06.08.2025 (Annexure P/1 and P/2) in relation to review and amendment of the Bespoke Policy introduced vide Notification bearing No. F 20- 14/2022/11/(6), Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar dated 28.02.2022 by passing a reasoned and speaking order.
4. Learned counsel for the State raised no objection in this regard.
5. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised in this writ petition, submissions of the counsels for the respective parties, instead of keeping this writ petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Respondent no. 1 and 2 to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 06.08.2025 (Annexure P/1 and P/2) in accordance with law, rules and regulations in an objective manner expeditiously as soon as possible preferably within 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, if not already decided.
7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the petition stands
disposed of.
8. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the case. Sd/-
(Arvind Kumar Verma)
JUDGE Madhurima