$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3942/2025 AKASH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pooja Chauhan, Adv. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Shubham Goyal, Advs. and SI Vinod Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA O R D E R % 01.12.2025 CRL.M.A. 35499/2025 (exemption from filing certified copies etc.) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 3942/2025 1. This is a writ petition filed on behalf of the petitioner with the following prayer: a. Issue of writ of Mandamus for directions to Respondents No.1 and 2 to provide effective police protection to the Petitioner, an advocate, in view of constant Threats and attempt to implicate him in false POCSO/women complaint and ensure fair Preliminary inquiry before any action is taken. b. Direct police to ensure patrolling & law and order protection for residents of the locality including the Petitioner; c. Pass any other order(s) which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel who appears for the petitioner submits that petitioner is an advocate facing constant threats and attempt to falsely implicate him in POCSO/Women harassment complaints. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/12/2025 at 12:22:55 3. It has been submitted that petitioner was earlier granted police protection by this Court vide order dated 20.11.2025 in W.P.(CRL) 3829/2025 wherein this Court directed respondents nos. 1 & 2 to ensure the safety of petitioner and his family. However, despite the protection order, on 23.11.2025 at about 10:20 AM one Kavita (mother of accused Karan) forcefully came to the petitioner’s residence and abused and threatened the petitioner’s mother publicly stating “Tune mere bete ki bail cancel kaise laga di? Tujhe bata dungi ache se”. She then tried to manhandle, shouted publicly, and threatened to falsely implicate the petitioner in POCSO/women harassment case. The petitioner’s mother immediately informed the petitioner on telephone and the petitioner then dialed at 112 but police took no action. 4. SI Vinod Kumar from Police Station Palam Village present in Court states that on receipt of the information the police swung into action and found that no major incident had taken place and matter was sorted out between the parties. 5. In continuation of the order dated 20.11.2025 granting police protection, respondent nos. 1 & 2 are again directed to continue providing protection to the petitioner and ensure that no physical harm befalls to the petitioner. 6. The petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the aforesaid orders. RAVINDER DUDEJA, J DECEMBER 1, 2025 Gs/ma This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/12/2025 at 12:22:55