APHC010253702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13374/2025 Between: 1. DAVVOD BAIG, S/O. SATTAR BAIG, AGED 66 ABOUT 66 YEARS, RTD. EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO. 1-3A, GARIKAPARU VILLAGE, THOTALAVALLURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. 2. ABDUL SATTAR BAIG, S/O. DAVOOD BAIG, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO. 5-421, INDRA NAGAR II, YENAMALAKUDU, PENAMULUR MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. . 3. MD. NOORJHAN BEGUM, W/O. YUNIS SHERIFF, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 5-421, INDRA NAGAR II, YENAMALAKUDUR, PENAMULURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIT BUILDING AT VELGAPUDU, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENRAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DIST. 3. THE SUPREDIENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THOTALAVALLURU POLICE STATION, THOTALAVALLURU, KRISHNA DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the acts of the 4th respondent against the petitioner 1 and 2 by their acts and deeds of illegal, unlawful confinement and ill treatment and bet the petitioners indiscriminately by confining the petitioners in station illegally and without considering the health condition of the 1st petitioner is illegal and contrary in the principles of natural justice and consequently directing the 2ndvrespondent to make an appropriate enquiry and to take action against the 4th respondent with appropriate orders and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 4th respondent not to take any further coercive steps against the petitioners without following the due process of law pending disposal of the above petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 4th respondent to seize the CCTV Footage from 11 am to 7 pm of Thotalavalluru Police station dt. 28.04.2025and produce the same before this Hon’ble Court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K J DAYANAND KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13374 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the acts of the 4th respondent against the petitioner 1 and 2 by their acts and deeds of illegal, unlawful confinement and ill treatment and bet the petitioners indiscriminately by confining the petitioners in station illegally and without considering the health condition of the 1st petitioner is illegal and contrary in the principles of natural justice and consequently directing the 2ndvrespondent to make an appropriate enquiry and to take action against the 4th respondent with appropriate orders and to pass.…” 2. Heard Sri K.J.Dayanand Kumar, learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the Respondents. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Respondent No.4 ill-treated the Petitioners in the Police Station. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that Non-Bailable Warrant is pending against the Petitioner No.1 in C.C.No.78 of 2019 on the file of the X Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vuyyuru. He would further submit that one Shakeena Begum, the 3rd wife of the Petitioner No.1 made a complaint before the Inspector of Police, making allegations against the Petitioner No.1 and his 4 family members, relating to which, the Petitioners were called to the Police Station for preliminary enquiry. The Respondent No.4 advised them to settle the matter amicably and also advised the Petitioner No.1 to work out his remedies before the Court where the case is pending. Hence, they made false allegations against the Police. 5. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to make a representation to the Superintendent of Police and on receipt of such representation, the Respondent No.3/Superintendent of Police shall act according to Governing Rules and Law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.11.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13374 of 2025 Dated.21.11.2025 UPS 185