Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7133 of 2017 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.
1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. 3. Sri Devendra Nath Mishra, learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant- Brijbhan Singh, with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the judgement and order dated 21.01.2017 passed by Additional Sessions Judge / Fast Track Court No.1, Hathras, in Criminal Revision No. 218 of 2012 (Brijbhan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another) as well as the order dated 24.09.2012 passed by Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No.2, Hathras in Case No. 269 of 2010 (Dharamveer Vs. Brijbhan), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., with a further prayer that proceedings of the aforesaid case. 5. Previously on 03.09.2025 the matter was adjourned on the illness slip reported by Sri Pankaj Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant but the other learned counsel appearing in the matter was not present and the following order was passed by this Court:-
"1. List revised. 2. There is an illness slip reported of Sri Pankaj Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant. The records show that there is one other learned counsel appearing in the matter but he is not present. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Sharma, Prashant Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Brijbhan Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
3. Sri Shashikant Pandey, learned counsel for the State is present. 4. Since there is illness slip reported of learned counsel for the applicant, in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned. 5. Let the matter be listed on 17.09.2025 peremptorily."
6. This matter is reported by the office through the report dated 03.03.2025 of Registrar (J) (Listing) that it is likely to be infructuous. 7. Perused the records. 8. Since there is no one appearing on behalf of the applicant to press this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C., the matter being likely to have become infructuous by efflux of time, the same is dismissed as such. 9. The present application is dismissed as infructuous. 10.
Office to communicate this order to the District and Sessions Judge/trial court concerned within a week. September 17, 2025 AS Rathore A482 No. 7133 of 2017 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad