APHC010122332020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7479/2020 Between: 1. RASUPALLI VEERA SUDARSANA REDDY, @ VEERA SUDHAKAR REDDY,, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O LATE R. CHINNA VEERA REDDY, R/O FLAT NO.402, SRI LAKSHMI ELITE APARTMENT, OPP. LANE TO RAVINDRA BHARATHI (EM) HIGH SCHOOL, N.G.O. COLONY, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT.516 002. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, .REP.BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, V.S.R DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 5. RASUPALLY VEERA JAYA LAKSHMI VEERA JAYA LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O BYREDDY VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O D.NO.8-3-99/2, KOTIREDDY NAGAR, BADVEL TOWN. Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 516 227. 6. BYREDDY VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O D.NO.8-3-99/2, KOTIREDDY NAGAR, BADVEL TOWN. Y.S.R. DISTRICT. 516 227. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the official respondents particularly respondent No 4 in not registering the FIR on the report dated 26-7-2019 given by the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional, Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M R S SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the official respondents particularly respondent No 4 in not registering the FIR on the report dated 26-7-2019 given by the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional, ...” At the time of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that basing on the complaint of the Petitioner, the Investigating Officer called the Petitioner and enquired the matter, wherein, it revealed that there are property disputes between him and his sister. The investigation also revealed that the sister of the Petitioner filed a complaint against the Petitioner herein which is the subject matter in Crime No.32 of 2020 of Kadapa I Town Police Station and the issue is pending with RDO, Kadapa and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. None represented for the Petitioner. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh