2025: JHHC:10758 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 1276 of 2025 Ranvijay Singh, aged about 55 years, S/o Yugeshwar Singh, R/o Village Manjhuliya, P.O. P.S. Rajpur, District Chatra --- --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dineshwar Singh, aged about 45 years, S/o Bhubneswar Singh, R/o Village Manjhuliya, P.O and P.S. Rajpur, District Chatra --- --- Opp. Parties With B.A No. 1278 of 2025 Rambriksh Singh @ Rambriksha Singh, aged about 53 years, S/o Yugeshwar Singh, R/o Village Manjhuliya, P.O. P.S. Rajpur, District Chatra --- --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dineshwar Singh, aged about 45 years, S/o Bhubneswar Singh, R/o Village Manjhuliya, P.O and P.S. Rajpur, District Chatra --- --- Opp. Parties --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath --- For the Petitioner: M/s Ajit Kumar, Sr. Advocate, Tanya Singh, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P. [B.A. 1276/2025] Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, A.P.P [B.A. 1278/2025] --- 03 / 08.04.2025 Both these bail applications arise out of the same police station. As such, they are being disposed of by a common order. Heard the parties. 2. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2020 for the offences registered under sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 504, 506, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Smt. S.S. Minz, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra. 3. On 01.08.2020 at 1.00 noon, Informant was ploughing his field when the petitioners along with co-accused persons came there and assaulted the Informant. However, he managed to escape from there and went to his house where he inquired about the whereabouts of his daughter. It is alleged that petitioners had carried the child and thrown her in a well, due to which, she died. 4. Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submitted that there is no eyewitness to the occurrence. It was further submitted that it is beyond any stretch of imagination that anyone will 2. throw a child in the well. It was further submitted that no witness has supported the occurrence. 5. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail stands rejected. (Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded