Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51844 (AP)

Bobba Sambasiva Rao, v. Bobba Venkata Krishna Rajasekhar,

CRP/2517/2025 · 2025-12-18

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010510992025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2517/2025 Between: 1. BOBBA SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O. LATE NAGESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 63 YECIRS, R/O. PLOT NO. 120, VASANTHA NAGAR, KUKATPALLY, BALANAGAR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE CURRENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO. 9-153/1, ROY NAGAR, SBI ROAD, GANNAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA 2. BOBBA PADMAVATHI, W/O. SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEAIRS, R/O. PLOT NO. 120, VASANTHA NAGAR, KUKATPALLY, BALANAGAR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE CURRENTLY RESIDING ,AT D.NO. 9-153/1, ROY NAGAR, SBI ROAD, GANNAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. BOBBA VENKATA KRISHNA RAJASEKHAR, S/O. LATE NARAYANA BABU. AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 10-65, SALIPETA BALAJI NAGAR, PORANK, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. BOBBA MURALI KRISHNA, S/O. JAYA PRASAD RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. AMADALAPALLI VILLAGE, UNGUTURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of Civil Revision Petition against the Order Dt. 25- 2 07-2025 in I.A No. 277 of 2024 in UNNUMBERED A.S OF 2024 on the file of the THE XIV ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE GUDIVADA. fo IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay all further proceedings in F.D.P No. 204 of 2024 in O.S NO. 86 of 2019 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge Court, Gannavaram Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MARRI VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ANJANEYULU TIRUMALASETTY 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the revision petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the civil revision petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY Date: 19.12.2025 MH 4 43 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2517/2025 Date: 19.12.2025 MH