APHC010657812023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 102/2024 Between: SMT.KANAMATHAREDDY VENKATA SUNITHA, W/O LATE SRINIVASA REDDY, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1- 79/2, VIJAYARAI VILLAGE-534 475, ELURU DISTRICT (AADHAAR NO.2022 2231 7690). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME), GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, DGP COMPLEX, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU. 4. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 5. THE SHO, CHINTALAPUDI PS, CHINTALAPUDI, ELURU DISTRICT. 6. KANAMATHAREDDY JAWAHAR REDDY, S/O LATE VENKATA REDDY @ BABU RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGED 68 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 2-21, PRAGADAVARAM VILLAGE, CHINTALAPUDI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 7. SMT VINTHA PRASOONA, W/O GOPALA KRISHNA REDDY, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 67 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 4-220, TELAPROLU, UNGUTURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. SMT BATHULA SWAROOPA, W/O RAMESH REDDY, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 64 YEARS, R/O VENKATARAMI REDDY HEIGHTS APARTMENT, 5TH LINE, SARABHAYYA TEMPLE ROAD, 5TH LINE, DURGAPURAM AREA, VIJAYAWADA-520 003. 9. BATHULA RAMESH REDDY, S/O VENKATARAMI REDDY HINDU, MALE, AGED 66 YEARS, HEIGHTS APARTMENT, 5TH LINE, SARABHAYYA TEMPLE ROAD, 5TH LINE, DURGAPURAM AREA, VIJAYAWADA-520 003. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B V KRISHNA REDDY 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... writ of Mandamus directing the respondent-SHO, Chintalapudi to register FIR against the unofficial respondents (6 to 11 and to take stern action against the unofficial respondents on their illegal, high- handed and barbarian act of cutting away the valuable palm oil trees.” 2. Sri B.V.Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Police are not taking any action on the complaint given by the Petitioners. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the contents of the complaint given by the Petitioner are of civil nature, as such, the Police have not registered any case based on the said complaint. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.102 of 2024 Dt.22.11.2025 Dinesh