HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU RPSW No. 10/2011 in SWP No. 1836/2006 Shaheen Begum …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Agam Gandotra, Advocate vice Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Advocate. vs State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG. Mr. M. Y. Akhoon, Advocate. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE ORDER 25.07.2025 1. Mr. Agam Gandotra, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, learned arguing counsel for the petitioner submits that as per instructions from the learned arguing counsel, there are no instructions in the matter from the petitioner to prosecute the same, as such, he does not want to press the instant petition. 2. His statement is taken on record. 3. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed. (JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE Jammu 25.07.2025 Sahil Padha Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No. Serial No. 7 Sahil Padha 2025.07.25 12:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document