Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 51829 (BOM)
MADHUKAR S/O RAMLU CHINTAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND FOREST, MUMBAI AND OTHERS
WP/8471/2019 · 2025-01-06
Shri Nitin W Sambre, Vrushali V Joshi
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51829 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51829 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 22.wp.8471.19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.8471/2019 Madhukar s/o. Ramlu Chintawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. D.Sukhadev, Advocate h/f. Mr. S. S. Ghate, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. D. P. Thakare, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 06/01/2025. . Since the petitioner is claiming to be agitating same issue before the Civil Court, the petition is not pressed.
2. The petition is dismissed accordingly.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule 2025:BHC-NAG:82-DB