APHC010089552016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36325/2016 Between: 1. MURUKURI VENKATA APPA RAO, S/O.LATE.SRI.SANYASI RAO, HINDU, OCC: BUSINESS, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.13-38, KOTHAVALASA, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA, SPECIALIZED CURRENCY ADMINISTRATION BRANCH, REP BY ITS MANAGER (SCAB), REGION-V, SIRIPURAM JUNCTION, BALAJ INAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 003. 2. STATE BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE ADMINISTRATION SECTION, REP BY ITS ZONAL MANAGER, SIRIPURAM JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 003. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the Notice of Termination dated 30-09-2016 issued by the respondent bank terminating the contract of Hiring the Cash Vans of Mahindra & Mahindra make bearing Registration Nos.AP 35U 7337, AP 35V 3453 and AP35V 9034, existing with the petitioner, before the expiry of the period of contract as premature, arbitrary, unreasonable, unethical and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and for a consequential direction to the respondents to continue with the hiring of Cash Vans in terms of the period of contract and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 44741 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass Interim Orders of Direction directing the respondents not to give affect of the Notice of Termination dated 30-09-2016 issued by the respondent bank in terminating the contract of Hiring the Cash Vans of Mahindra 86 Mahindra make bearing Registration Nos.AP 35U 7337, AP 35V 3453 and AP35V 9034, existing with the petitioner and that to continue the hiring of three cash vans, pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY The Court made the following ORDER: Ms. P.V.S. Harika, learned counsel, representing Sri P. Rajesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 14.10.2025 KAS 239 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36325/2016 Dated: 14.10.2025 KAS