IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT-h^' (Special Original Jurisdiction)^'^ THURSDAV ,THE twenty fourth day of APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE^' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ^ WRIT PETITION NO: 17155 OF 2005 ^ 1 Between: Smt. A. Zareena khatoon, S/o. Hameed, Aged 47 yrs, Occ:Working as Trained Graduate Teacher Hindi, A.P. Social Welfare Residential School, Adapoor, Nandaloor Mandal, Kadapa District. A.P. S ...Petitioner AND 1. The Secretary, A.P. Residential Educational Institution Society, Hyderabad. r 2. The Principal, A.P. Residential School (BC-B), Satyavedu, Chittoor District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari calling for all the connected records including the impugned Proceedings of the 1st respondent in Rc.No. 4109/A2-2A2002-05, dated 26-4-2005, and quash the same as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and further direct the 1st respondent to treat the period from 13-12-2002 to 25-2-2003 compulsory wait and direct the respondents herein to pay the salary to the above period to the petitioner herein and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 21838 OF 2005) as Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition, pending disposal above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI. K RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: may be of the APHC010391462005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17155/2005 Between: ( Smt. A. Zareena Khatoon, Kadapa District ...PETITIONER AND The Secretary Hyderabad Another and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KRAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.K DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following order: Miss Mahalakshmi, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner had retired from her service and has no interest in prosecuting the case further and prayed to dismiss the writ petition. ...RESPONDENT(S) In view of the above submission that the petitioner had retired from her service and has no interest in prosecuting the case, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the ^ writ petition i Miscellaneous applications. IS dismissed. No costs, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- V.DIWAKAR deputy registrar //TRUE COPY// MK To, section officer [OPUC] - [OPUC] 1. One CC to SRI. K RAMAMOHAN Advocate [ 2. One CC to SRI. K DURGA PRASAD Advocate 3. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED :24/04/2025 ORDER OespAtc^ o\ WP.No.17155 of 2005 ■.X if. DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS