Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51824 (AP)

KARANAM CHANDINI v. STATE OF AP

WP/11455/2020 · 2025-09-17

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010179442020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 11455/2020 Between: 1. KARANAM CHANDINI, W/O CHANDRASEKHARA RAO, AGE. 37, R/O KOSALI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 2. EROUTHU SAVITRAMMA, W/O LATE MALLESWARA RAO, AGE.60, R/O KOSALI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 3. OMMI RAMADEVI, W/O SANKARA RAO, AGE. 41, R/O KOSALI VILLAGE, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT AMARAVATI 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKONDA SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 4. THE TAHASILDAR, BHAMINI MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT T ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P RAJKUMAR 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.11455 of 2020 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.11455 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their respective house site plots to an extent of Ac.0.03 cents, Ac.0.4 cents and Ac.0.04 cents situated in Sy.No.153 of Kosali Village Bhamini Mandal, Srikakulam District, without following the due process of law for providing house sites/housing units to the beneficiaries under the “Navaratnalu – Pedalandariki Illu” Scheme. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter affidavit of the 4th respondent submits that the subject land is an assigned land and the D-form pattas issued in favour of the petitioners were cancelled. 4. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent authorities have not utilized for the above said purpose of the said scheme. 5. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land strictly in accordance with law and if the petitioners are otherwise found to be in possession of the same, they shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law, by giving due opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned including the petitioners and 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.11455 of 2020 upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 18.09.2025 PGT