Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51819 (KAR)

DODDAMARDANSAB MOHAMADHANEEFSAB NADAF (SINCE DECEASED BY LRS) v. MOHAMMED KHIZAR THE CHAAIRMAN

CCC/100042/2025 · 2025-04-21

C M Poonacha, S G Pandit

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6640-DB CCC No. 100042 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100042 OF 2025 BETWEEN: DODDAMARDANSAB MOHAMADHANEEFSAB NADAF (SINCE DECEASED BY LR’S) 1. KASIMSAB S/O DODDAMARDANSAB NADAF, AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NAREGAL 581104, TQ. HANGAL, DIST. HAVERI. MOHMADHANEEF S/O SANNAMARDANSAB NADAF (SINCE DECEASED BY LR’S) 2. ALTAF S/O MOHAMMADHANEEF NADAF AGE. 25 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NAREGAL 581104, TQ. HANGAL, DIST. HAVERI. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. LAXMAN T. MANTAGANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MOHAMMED KHIZAR THE CHAIRMAN, LAND TRIBUNAL HANGAL, DIST. HAVERI 581104. …ACCUSED 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR PROFORMA RESPONDENT; NOTICE TO A1 IS SERVED) MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6640-DB CCC No. 100042 of 2025 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO, PUNISH THE ACCUSED-1 FOR COMMITTING THE CONTEMPT OF COURT, FOR DELIBERATE DISOBEYING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P. NO.103788/2022 (GM-RES) DATED 15/10/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ALLOW THE ABOVE CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) This contempt petition is filed complaining disobedience of the order dated 15.10.2024 in W.P.No.103788/2022 wherein this Court directed respondent No.2 to rectify the technical error crept in the order, after providing suitable opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties. 2. Learned counsel for the complainants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent/accused No.2 would submit that the direction issued by this Court has been complied by passing order dated 19.04.2025 which is filed by the learned Additional - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6640-DB CCC No. 100042 of 2025 Government Advocate along with memo dated 21.04.2025. 3. We have gone through the order dated 19.04.2025 passed by the respondent/accused No.2. 4. Taking note of the submission of learned counsel appearing for both the parties as well as order dated 19.04.2025, we are satisfied that there is substantial compliance of the direction issued by this Court. As such, further proceedings in the present contempt petition are dropped. 5. Pending applications, if any, are disposed off as not surviving for consideration. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE NC LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 25