APHC010858862017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2789 OF 2017 Between: 1. NAGISETTI USHASRI, W/O UMA MAHESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O NANDULAPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD. 2. PADARTHI KAPIL, S/O PURNACHANDRA RAO, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O # 6-4-17, GANGANAMMAPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENTS Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CrI.R.C., by setting aside the order dt. 24-8-2017 passed in CrI.M.P.No. 1407 of 2017 in C.C.No. 535/2015 on the file of the I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tenali; and to grant such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 4551 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner 2 in C.C.No. 535 of 2015 on the file of the 1st Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tenali, pending disposal of the main revision, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S LAKSHMI PRAMEELA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SRI K. SANDEEP, ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: O R D E R 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioner/accused under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the Order dated 24.08.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1407 of 2017 in C.C.No.535 of 2015 on the file of learned I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tenali (for short, ‘the trial Court’). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 24.08.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1407 of 2017 in C.C.No.535 of 2015. The Crl.M.P.No.1407 of 2017 has been filed by the petitioner/accused seeking to send Ex.P1, promissory note and Ex.P6, Postal Acknowledgment with her admitted signature on memo of appearance and on the PAN Card to the Expert opinion. By impugned order dated 24.08.2017, the trial Court dismissed the petition. Against the said order, the petitioner herein preferred the revision. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the main C.C.No.535 of 2015 was disposed on 11.12.2017. In support of this, a copy from the e-Courts website has been filed, which reflects that the said C.C.No.535 of 2015 was disposed on contest on 11.12.2017. 3 5. Recording the said submission of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and in view of the disposal of the C.C.No.535 of 2015 on 11.12.2017, this Court finds the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 05.11.2025 MS 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2789 of 2017 Date: 05.11.2025 MS