Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5179 (UTT)

NAND RAM v. ANIL KUMAR

SPA/1006/2017 · 2025-10-07

Alok Mahra, Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 14 SPA No.1006 of 2017 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the appellants, through video conferencing. Mr. Sushil Vashistha, Standing Counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the appellant, at the very outset, submits that due to efflux of time, the appeal has rendered infructuous. The appeal is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Alok Mahra J.) (Ravindra Maithani J.) 07.10.2025 RV